King Lear by William Shakespeare and Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe Essay Example

King Lear by William Shakespeare and Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe Paper Tragedy is based on human flaws and the struggles which build up among passionate beings. What characterizes mankind is not solely the virtue of each, but the complexity of psychologies, the failure to stand with reason. Tragedy, in fact, is able to capture the essence of the being in his inconstant nature, by putting forth the many obstacles in accomplishing virtue. It takes the dilemma of a common individual to the extreme point, in order to unveil the ultimate prowess of the soul humanity. What the reader or audience then admires are the things man does to achieve human goodness; we admire the hero. If men were gods, tragedy would become simple melodrama in the eyes of such an easy quest for truth. It is exactly the opposite in reality. A hero becomes a hero by the endless effort he puts forth the noble side of living ignorants. This is clear in all tragedies, as in King Lear by William Shakespeare and Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe. Achebes novel is set in the Igbo tribe, in what we would today call Nigeria. Okonkwo, a respected member of the tribe, is the epitome of a self-made man, well anchored in his values of manliness and tradition. We will write a custom essay sample on King Lear by William Shakespeare and Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on King Lear by William Shakespeare and Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on King Lear by William Shakespeare and Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer He made his own fortune through hard labor, is known to be a brave warrior, and cares about the strength of his world: capable of feeding his family, good status within the tribe. These characteristics are no less virtuous than his faults are great, namely the rage and intolerance for what he considers weak and woman-like. This outlines the series of peripeteia which lead to his downfall, throughout the second half of the book. One can admire Okonkwo for the very same reasons another can despise him (which is true for any great hero Napoleon). It is this dichotomy which makes him human, and which makes tragedy even possible. In his relationship with Ikemefuna, for whom he bears great love and respect, the virtues of Okonkwo are quite clear. He has pride in seeing the dynamic enterprise of his sons at farming and growing yams. He enjoys seeing Ikemefuna as a role-model to Nwoye. However, when the time comes to kill the adopted child, Okonkwos weakness the fear of being considered weak grows on him as he does the dirty job himself. This is a harsh blow to the reader, but it helps build up our knowledge of wild passions which make all men condemnable. It is also interesting to note the complicity he feels towards Ezinma, his daughter, to whom he also bears much love and respect, saying that she should have been a man. He admires her strong character, cares for her when shes sick, follows her through the night to assure himself of her safety. Okonkwos disregard for his fathers life and life-long struggle to be different from him all falls to pieces in the end (which is the major theme of the book). We can feel in Okonkwo a deep disregard for the sheer goodness of people, their bear humanity, arguing that the main thing is strength, to feed ones family, to be successful It would be too far fetched however to say that he is devoid of humanity himself. In the harmony of the tribe, Okonkwos values and accomplishments make him great and admirable. His intolerance only contributes to seeing in him what Unoka had, a human flaw, a fatal one for Okonkwo. Had he not killed Ikemefuna, shot at his wife, rejected Nwoye, the reader would have no concept of the Roaring Flames true soul which lies in the midst of chaos and ashes an admirable warrior. In King Lear, the audience tends to condemn Lear for his actions in the beginning. It is hard to forgive him for banishing Cordelia and Kent, who appear most noble and just, in contrast with the two evil flatterers Goneril and Regan. Shakespeare puts the emphasis right from the beginning on Lears misjudgment, to grasp the man in all his flaws. We nonetheless understand his reaction as he feels solemnly betrayed by his daughter. This first mistake is the trigger to all the horror which follows; his initial mistake (giving up his responsibilities and leaving full responsibility in the hands of his evil daughters) is what defines him as a human and will later build him into a hero. We admire Lear because he is noble and has the countenance of a kingauthority. He knows how to give orders and make things happen. However he is not heroic to the point where the audience idolizes him or turns him into a god-like stature. Like any man, he makes mistakes. Furthermore, we feel his growing human goodness towards others as his pains grow stronger. he is able to care for others he depends on. Art thou cold, Fool? (As a king he was widely praised and followed by sycophants and servants. He is also admirable in taking his fate into his hands when confronted with a dilemma (which differentiates him from Gloucesters weakness); he is responsible and charges into life consciously until the moment he goes mad. In the end, when Lear comes out with Cordelia in his arms, howling to the skies and to the world, we reach the climax of the admiration towards Lear. His pain appears so great that the audience identifies with the human feeling of despair. The crash, like a thunderbolt of lightning, hits us straight to the heart and Lears tears, which he tried to hold in the whole play, drip on everyones laps. In conclusion, the author of a tragedy must create a compelling character in goodness and sin. It must become a heroic struggle which imples both sides of the spectrum a persons most condemnable side and most beautiful side. A tragic hero could neither be Hitler or DArtagnan. They are filled with too much of one and the other. The hero must be someone the reader can identify with in reality, to accompany his struggle and find a better truth.