Should the police use deceit in interrogations Essay

Should the police use deceit in interrogations - Essay Example endment provides a person with the right not to confess anything against one’s own will, there are bunches of strong psychological techniques that help police to extract the confessions they need from their suspects, making a suspect confused in whether his confession is his own or has come against his actual will (Najdowski & Bonventre 26). Hence, police workers often use multiple tricks and deceptive methods during interrogations of their suspects. The use of deceit during interrogations may be implemented in multiple forms. Policemen often speculate with false evidences and assert that they have something on the suspect, for instance, that they’ve found fingerprints of personal stuff of the suspect on the crime scene, or that they’ve got some witnesses who saw the suspect making the crime, when in fact they’ve got nothing on the person. Such kind of method of interrogation is not only unethical but may lead to a case going in the wrong path of investiga tion. First of all, application of tricks and different deceptive psychological techniques during the interrogation process can make a suspect to confess in a crime one hasn’t done. Some studies on the matter mark out two kinds of false confessions result from a suspect’s entanglement in the current state of affairs of a case. The â€Å"coerced-compliant† (Conti 22) confession is the confession when a suspect is stressed and terrified by the police’s psychological oppression and agrees to confess in order to get rid of the stress he’s got into. Thus a person might be aware of the fact that he hasn’t done anything wrong but thinking of the police having something on him makes one desperate, so he starts considering confession, as it may probably shorten his sentence. Moreover, police often offers some deals of protection in court, so the suspect decides that if anyway he’s going to be sentenced, then why not to get at least a smaller sentenc e. The second type of false confessions is called

Politics of the knowledge Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 2

Politics of the knowledge - Essay Example Moreover, it crates diverse outlining mechanism of the societal, communicative coupled with chronological references. Constructivist makes this story to be radical, inventive and popular thus conforming to the modern approach of the societal science. Majority of the populace prefer truth-possessing evidence coupled with diverse comprehension. Traditions are methodological that share healthy skepticism of inductivism of knowledge and truth. Inductivism emphasizes on the significance of precise experimental element of the underlying story. Moreover, there is no substitute for an analyst’s knowledge with a data in historical learning of practical influence (Carr, 1987). Above argument is evident in the elaboration of the theory of the epistemic justification and understanding of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca. All aspects of the chapter aid in understanding despite the existence of competing ideas. Constructivism aids in inserting studies into a bigger social scientific projects. Chapter 8 gives distinct description of the diverse methods , which readers can comprehend the patterns of the